While Donald Trump is claiming he had kept more promises made, among the promises he hasn’t kept so far is either the government or insurance paying for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. It should be fairly obvious he wasn’t going to keep it considering he had this level information when proposed it:
what we’re going to do is for people that are using IVF, which is fertilization, we are govern the government is going to pay for it or we’re going to get or mandate your insurance company to pay for it, which is going to be great. We’re going to do that.
At a Friday press briefing with Trump’s press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, she was asked about that by the Washington Examiners Christian Datoc this way: “Has the president abandoned his campaign pledge to mandate insurance coverage for IVF services?” Leavitt responded “no”. And then he followed up, “Was there any update on that? We flew by that May EO deadline for the White House to produce a plan.” Leavitt confusingly responded that “I literally just read a statement from the Health and Human Services on you uh for you for Libby at least as far as IVF goes.” The statement referenced there was about a generic version of the abortion drug mifepristone, which is not in any way connected to IVF. She then added “I’ll check in with our policy team and we’ll get you some updates.”
The “EO deadline” mentioned in the questioning was a reference to a February executive order instructed staff to come up policy recommendation that are short of the campaign promise:
Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy shall submit to the President a list of policy recommendations on protecting IVF access and aggressively reducing out-of-pocket and health plan costs for IVF treatment.
That was supposed to happen by May and it was reported at the time the recommendations had been provided. Those recommendations were not made public and nothing more seems to have been done since then.
There has been reporting that a Make American Healthy Again alternative was possibly impacting a change in policy.
Leave a Reply